Chas. Darwin (the early years) |
There is grandeur in this view of life, with
its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into
one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed
law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and
most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
The seriously cool
part about Darwin’s (some say Satan-inspired) little idea is not merely his “grandeur view of life,” but rather
that his (not entirely original – yup, it also evolved) “theory” is proven
time and time, and time – and yes, time again to…to be…to be, oh, what’s that
word? Oh, yeah, that’s right – it's true! Don’t believe me? Check-it-out, here’s
a contemporary and real world, objective and even tangible example illustrating
Darwin’s notion of natural selection in all its subtle glory.
Between March and
April 2013, The Pew’s Religion & Public Life Project randomly
polled over 1900 adults throughout the U.S., and asked a number of questions
about religious beliefs, political affiliations, gender, race, and even if the
respondents “believed” in evolution or rather, were they adherents of the notion of a divinely inspired creation.
God (or Santa?) |
(looks like God) |
So, did those polled
believe than life was created, in its present form by God (no, not Gods)? Or in
the alternative, did they essentially believe the Universe started some 13.5 billion years ago, the Galaxy 13 billion years ago, the Solar System 4.8 billion, the
Earth some 4.5 billion years ago; did simple cells develop some 3.6 billion
years ago, complex cells 2 billion years ago, multi-celled organisms 1
billion years ago, simple "animals" 600 million years, mammals 200
million, primates 60 million, hominids some 20 million
years ago, and well, heck…‘Voila! Present day dudes ‘n dudettes!
In 2009, 64% of Democrats said humans evolved over time, while 4 years later, that number increased to over two-thirds or fully 67% of Democrats saying folks done e-volved over time. With just about every bit of polling data showing that Democrats continue to outnumber their Republican opponents, and especially when considering the increase in the U.S. population, it’s easy to see how the left is surviving – nay, even flourishing.
It's not just natural, natural selection!
Prof. Megginson |
Point being is that
them infernal lefties is clearly adaptable to change. Heck, pretty
sure that’s the bedrock foundation of their “Liberal” ideology – that whole
inclusive, “changey” thing (a demonic euphemism for evolution, to be sure).
Wha-What’s that? What
about them other guys? See, in that same study, 54% of Republicans said they
believed folks evolved over time and now, nearly 4 years later with our Tea
Baggin’ friends seizing control of Lincoln’s GOP, the number of Republicans
stating that humans have evolved, dropped to 43%. Corresponding with this fairly substantial decline is the Gallup party affiliation tracking poll which shows that as
recently as September 2004, fully 39% of registered voters identified
themselves as Republicans. By October 2008, the number of folks claiming GOP loyalty
had dropped to 33%, by May 2010, to 30%, and by the end of 2012, the number had
plummeted to 24%.
Ergo (one ‘o them
fancy-schmancy words meaning, therefore), the political party most adaptable to
change is the one that will clearly survive. With the number of registered
Republicans dropping faster than a hooker’s panties at a political convention
(or hooker’s at the C-Street House or dropping faster’n David Vitter’s diapers,
take yer pick), looks like our right-wing friends is gonna e-volve themselves
right outta existence…
Links:
Darwin's On The Origin of Species (.pdf format)
Publics views on human evolution
Links:
Darwin's On The Origin of Species (.pdf format)
Publics views on human evolution
Evolution is disproved by millions of facts, such as the fact that polymerase is a product of it's own translation, which proves Special Creation. Atheists are obligated to explain how all things can exist if God does not exist. Their claim that God does not exist is in effect a statement that all that exists can come into being without God. The laws of nature about information have refuted the assumption of scientific materialism and the theories of chemical and biological evolution.
ReplyDeleteOver 100 yrs ago, Evolution Theory was plausible for naturalists because of their rejection of God. Biological science was rudamentary and archaic, and provided no information about the operations of the cell. Modern biology has very greatly changed what is known of genetics and biology. It has been discovered that life is based upon information which is digitally encoded and stored in a more compressed form than man's best computer technology. compression schemes. It possesses thousands of 3-dimensional information hierarchies directed to the cell. When the DNA molecule is supercoiled as chromatin, much of it's information is available to the cell which is not available when the molecule is uncoiled, and vice versa. Genetic information when read by the cell's machinery in one direction produces different information than when it is read by the cell's machinery in the other direction. This feature of design alone is so far superior to man's computer software that it is not currently possible for us to conceive how this could have been done while making all of it's information relevant and critical to the organism. It's individual information sequences are overlapping and nested sharing nucleotides between sequences across the entire molecule. It's sequences across the entire 7 ft. long molecule are organized to conform to linguistics laws which go beyond Zipf's law of Linguistics. It contains codes built upon codes which regulate the use of each other, even when they are distant from each other in the molecule. A recent discovery is a code which lies upon codes for proteins, sharing it's base pairs, and regulates how to express those sequences for proteins. If we liken the mechanical functions of the protein machines of the cell as it interacts with DNA, then the operations mirror the human language properties of phonetics, semantics, syntax, and grammar, and punctuation. The information input and output processing of DNA includes the analytical operations of proofreading, information comparison, cut, insert, copy-and-past, backup and restore, all of which operate by algorithmic operations which possess "if" and "when" statements, just like computer programs. Information, algorithms, and linguistics are all immaterial nature has no potential to produce them. They are products only producible by a mind. During the organism's development, the genetic information instructs the cell on how to turn on and off, like chemical light switches, many sequences of information of the DNA in a supremely complex and yet to be understood orchestral arrangement of various groupings and orders so as to build the structures of the organism. These patterns of genes being switched on and off is so complex that man will likely never be able to decipher it. Science has disproven evolution and proven that life was created. If you want to believe in evolution because you refuse to acknowledge the existence of our creator, nobody can stop you. But doing so is to be a denialists of the discoveries of modern science - things which the outdated concept of Charles Darwin over 150 yrs ago could not have predicted. Believing in evolution today is as antiquated as it was to believe that flies arose from meat or frogs arose from mud a century prior to Darwin.