Pages

Friday, January 3, 2014

Looks like our right-wing friends is gonna e-volve themselves right outta existence…

Chas. Darwin
(the early years)
In his 1859 publication of On The Origin of Species, Charlie Darwin concluded that his notion of natural selection provided a much more serene and magisterial approach to the origin of life within our natural world:

There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

The seriously cool part about Darwin’s (some say Satan-inspired) little idea is not merely his “grandeur view of life,” but rather that his (not entirely original – yup, it also evolved) “theory” is proven time and time, and time – and yes, time again to…to be…to be, oh, what’s that word? Oh, yeah, that’s right – it's true! Don’t believe me? Check-it-out, here’s a contemporary and real world, objective and even tangible example illustrating Darwin’s notion of natural selection in all its subtle glory.

Between March and April 2013, The Pew’s Religion & Public Life Project randomly polled over 1900 adults throughout the U.S., and asked a number of questions about religious beliefs, political affiliations, gender, race, and even if the respondents “believed” in evolution or rather, were they adherents of the notion of a divinely inspired creation.

God
(or Santa?)
(looks like God)
That is, did those polled believe that some invisible, all-knowing, all-powerful, deity who, by definition, existed before even time, energy, matter, gravity and all that other groovy stuff – and even though middle eastern Jews first wrote about him, somehow managed to look a lot like a seriously buffed Santa, or Ian McKellen (à la Gandalf, minus the gay of course); one day apparently felt that whole self-worship thing wasn’t cutting it, ‘n decided that what he really needed to make his godliness more better were a couple of minions to worship and admire him in all his splendor and greatness, an up ‘n decided to create life, the Universe and darn near everything (thanks Doug Adams) – especially including man and again, even though he had every opportunity to do it anywhere he wanted – Yellowstone or the Grand Canyon or anywhere nice would have been…nice, heck, the North Shore of Hawaii still makes for a splendid paradise (if'n he could just get rid of those annoying tourists), but apparently chose that freakin’ god forsaken land between the Tigris and Euphrates (been there, it seriously blows – big time) and, again, even though it’s in the middle of the middle east, decided to up ‘n create a European lookin’ dude ‘n dudette (I guess ‘cause Europe is much classier than…not Europe?). And then decided, well...you get the idea.
(definitely a white dude...)

So, did those polled believe than life was created, in its present form by God (no, not Gods)? Or in the alternative, did they essentially believe the Universe started some 13.5 billion years ago, the Galaxy 13 billion years ago, the Solar System 4.8 billion, the Earth some 4.5 billion years ago; did simple cells develop some 3.6 billion years ago, complex cells 2 billion years ago, multi-celled organisms 1 billion years ago, simple "animals" 600 million years, mammals 200 million, primates 60 million, hominids some 20 million years ago, and well, heck…‘Voila! Present day dudes ‘n dudettes!










Back to the whole point of this thing. Last spring the nice folks at Pew polled them folks, just like they did four years earlier. They then did what any good, reality-based thinkers do  they compared the results. Here's the deal:

In 2009, 64% of Democrats said humans evolved over time, while 4 years later, that number increased to over two-thirds or fully 67% of Democrats saying folks done e-volved over time. With just about every bit of polling data showing that Democrats continue to outnumber their Republican opponents, and especially when considering the increase in the U.S. population, it’s easy to see how the left is surviving – nay, even flourishing.

It's not just natural, natural selection!

Prof. Megginson
But who said, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change”? No, while most folks like to give him credit, it certainly wasn’t Chuck Darwin (it’s actually a paraphrase from a Professor Leon C. Megginson, a marketing professor at LSU who wrote something pretty close to it back in ‘63)?

Point being is that them infernal lefties is clearly adaptable to change. Heck, pretty sure that’s the bedrock foundation of their “Liberal” ideology – that whole inclusive, “changey” thing (a demonic euphemism for evolution, to be sure).

Wha-What’s that? What about them other guys? See, in that same study, 54% of Republicans said they believed folks evolved over time and now, nearly 4 years later with our Tea Baggin’ friends seizing control of Lincoln’s GOP, the number of Republicans stating that humans have evolved, dropped to 43%. Corresponding with this fairly substantial decline is the Gallup party affiliation tracking poll  which shows that as recently as September 2004, fully 39% of registered voters identified themselves as Republicans. By October 2008, the number of folks claiming GOP loyalty had dropped to 33%, by May 2010, to 30%, and by the end of 2012, the number had plummeted to 24%.

Ergo (one ‘o them fancy-schmancy words meaning, therefore), the political party most adaptable to change is the one that will clearly survive. With the number of registered Republicans dropping faster than a hooker’s panties at a political convention (or hooker’s at the C-Street House or dropping faster’n David Vitter’s diapers, take yer pick), looks like our right-wing friends is gonna e-volve themselves right outta existence…

Links:
Darwin's On The Origin of Species (.pdf format)
Publics views on human evolution

1 comment:

  1. Evolution is disproved by millions of facts, such as the fact that polymerase is a product of it's own translation, which proves Special Creation. Atheists are obligated to explain how all things can exist if God does not exist. Their claim that God does not exist is in effect a statement that all that exists can come into being without God. The laws of nature about information have refuted the assumption of scientific materialism and the theories of chemical and biological evolution.

    Over 100 yrs ago, Evolution Theory was plausible for naturalists because of their rejection of God. Biological science was rudamentary and archaic, and provided no information about the operations of the cell. Modern biology has very greatly changed what is known of genetics and biology. It has been discovered that life is based upon information which is digitally encoded and stored in a more compressed form than man's best computer technology. compression schemes. It possesses thousands of 3-dimensional information hierarchies directed to the cell. When the DNA molecule is supercoiled as chromatin, much of it's information is available to the cell which is not available when the molecule is uncoiled, and vice versa. Genetic information when read by the cell's machinery in one direction produces different information than when it is read by the cell's machinery in the other direction. This feature of design alone is so far superior to man's computer software that it is not currently possible for us to conceive how this could have been done while making all of it's information relevant and critical to the organism. It's individual information sequences are overlapping and nested sharing nucleotides between sequences across the entire molecule. It's sequences across the entire 7 ft. long molecule are organized to conform to linguistics laws which go beyond Zipf's law of Linguistics. It contains codes built upon codes which regulate the use of each other, even when they are distant from each other in the molecule. A recent discovery is a code which lies upon codes for proteins, sharing it's base pairs, and regulates how to express those sequences for proteins. If we liken the mechanical functions of the protein machines of the cell as it interacts with DNA, then the operations mirror the human language properties of phonetics, semantics, syntax, and grammar, and punctuation. The information input and output processing of DNA includes the analytical operations of proofreading, information comparison, cut, insert, copy-and-past, backup and restore, all of which operate by algorithmic operations which possess "if" and "when" statements, just like computer programs. Information, algorithms, and linguistics are all immaterial nature has no potential to produce them. They are products only producible by a mind. During the organism's development, the genetic information instructs the cell on how to turn on and off, like chemical light switches, many sequences of information of the DNA in a supremely complex and yet to be understood orchestral arrangement of various groupings and orders so as to build the structures of the organism. These patterns of genes being switched on and off is so complex that man will likely never be able to decipher it. Science has disproven evolution and proven that life was created. If you want to believe in evolution because you refuse to acknowledge the existence of our creator, nobody can stop you. But doing so is to be a denialists of the discoveries of modern science - things which the outdated concept of Charles Darwin over 150 yrs ago could not have predicted. Believing in evolution today is as antiquated as it was to believe that flies arose from meat or frogs arose from mud a century prior to Darwin.

    ReplyDelete